← Back to blog·Comparisons

The free alternative to Cursor Cloud

Cursor’s background agent is great — and ~$720/yr at the tier that unlocks it. Freebuff Cloud does the cloud-sandbox-and-preview part for $0.

FT
The Freebuff TeamBuilding the free coding agent
··7 min read

TL;DR

  • Cursor Cloud runs Cursor’s background agent in a remote sandbox — and the tier that unlocks it runs ~$60/mo ($720/yr), before any compute metering.
  • Freebuff Cloud gives you the same shape of thing — a cloud sandbox, a coding agent, a live preview — for $0.
  • It works with any GitHub repo, not just the ones Cursor manages.
  • If you live inside the Cursor IDE, keep Cursor for editing and point Freebuff Cloud at the same repo for the cloud-sandbox / shareable-preview part.

Cursor nailed the in-editor agent experience. Then they shipped a cloud version of it, and it is genuinely good — and genuinely gated. The plan that actually lets the background agent run in a remote sandbox is not the free or $20 tier. This is the breakdown for people who want the cloud part without the $720/yr.

What Cursor Cloud actually costs#

Cursor’s pricing moves around, but the pattern is consistent: the cheap tier is for local IDE use, and the cloud / background-agent capability lives higher up. By the time you can hand a task to a remote agent and walk away, you are on the ~$60/mo plan, and you are still watching a compute budget.

FeatureFreebuffCursor Cloud
Price$0~$60/mo ($720/yr) at the cloud tier
Cloud sandboxYes — any GitHub repoYes
Live preview URLYes, shareableLimited / via workspaces
Bring your own repoAny repo, public or privateYes
Per-task meteringNoneCompute-budgeted
In-IDE agentBrowser + terminal surfaceFirst-class VS Code fork
ModelsDeepSeek V4, MiMo 2.5 Pro, GLM 5.2, and moreClaude, GPT, Gemini via Cursor

Where Cursor Cloud is better#

  • The IDE. Cursor is a VS Code fork and the editor integration is the best in class. If your happy place is a tabbed editor with inline diffs, Cursor wins that fight.
  • Model breadth from one vendor. Cursor negotiates direct access to Claude, GPT, and Gemini. Freebuff runs top open-weight models plus optional connected ones.

Where Freebuff Cloud wins#

  • Price. $0 vs $720/yr. That is not a rounding error; it is the whole point.
  • No compute metering. You will never hit a "you are out of fast requests" wall mid-task.
  • A real shareable preview. The live preview URL is meant to be sent to people who do not have Cursor installed — clients, teammates, recruiters.
  • Any repo. A three-year-old monorepo, a fork, a private company repo. Cloud is not limited to projects Cursor manages.

Stop paying $60/mo for the cloud part

Connect a repo to Freebuff Cloud and get a sandbox + live preview for $0.

Try Freebuff Cloud free
Can Freebuff Cloud replace Cursor Cloud entirely?+
If you mainly used Cursor Cloud for the remote sandbox and shareable preview, yes. If you depend on Cursor’s in-editor agent UX, you will probably want to keep Cursor for editing and use Freebuff for the cloud-sandbox layer.
Do I have to move my repo?+
No. Connect the same GitHub repo to Freebuff Cloud. Nothing moves; Freebuff clones it into a fresh sandbox.
Is the agent actually free per task?+
Yes. No credits, no ACUs, no fast/slow request buckets. The agent runs in the sandbox for free.

About the author

FT

The Freebuff Team· Building the free coding agent

We build Freebuff — the free CLI coding agent — and Freebuff Web, the free way to ship full-stack apps. No subscription, no setup, no lock-in.

Topics:free cursor cloud alternativecursor cloud freecursor background agent freecursor cloud pricingcursor cloud vs freebufffree alternative to cursorfree cloud sandbox cursorcursor compute freefree background coding agentfree cloud coding agent

Keep reading