← Back to blog·Comparisons

The free alternative to Cursor Cloud

Cursor’s background agent is great — and ~$720/yr at the tier that unlocks it. Freebuff Cloud does the cloud-sandbox-and-preview part for $0.

FT
The Freebuff TeamBuilding the free coding agent
··7 min read

TL;DR

  • Cursor Cloud runs Cursor’s background agent in a remote sandbox — and the tier that unlocks it runs ~$60/mo ($720/yr), before any compute metering.
  • Freebuff Cloud gives you the same shape of thing — a cloud sandbox, a coding agent, a live preview — for $0.
  • It works with any GitHub repo, not just the ones Cursor manages.
  • If you live inside the Cursor IDE, keep Cursor for editing and point Freebuff Cloud at the same repo for the cloud-sandbox / shareable-preview part.

Cursor nailed the in-editor agent experience. Then they shipped a cloud version of it, and it is genuinely good — and genuinely gated. The plan that actually lets the background agent run in a remote sandbox is not the free or $20 tier. This is the breakdown for people who want the cloud part without the $720/yr.

What Cursor Cloud actually costs#

Cursor’s pricing moves around, but the pattern is consistent: the cheap tier is for local IDE use, and the cloud / background-agent capability lives higher up. By the time you can hand a task to a remote agent and walk away, you are on the ~$60/mo plan, and you are still watching a compute budget.

FeatureFreebuffCursor Cloud
Price$0~$60/mo ($720/yr) at the cloud tier
Cloud sandboxYes — any GitHub repoYes
Live preview URLYes, shareableLimited / via workspaces
Bring your own repoAny repo, public or privateYes
Per-task meteringNoneCompute-budgeted
In-IDE agentBrowser + terminal surfaceFirst-class VS Code fork
ModelsDeepSeek V4, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.2, and moreClaude, GPT, Gemini via Cursor

Where Cursor Cloud is better#

  • The IDE. Cursor is a VS Code fork and the editor integration is the best in class. If your happy place is a tabbed editor with inline diffs, Cursor wins that fight.
  • Model breadth from one vendor. Cursor negotiates direct access to Claude, GPT, and Gemini. Freebuff runs top open-weight models plus optional connected ones.

Where Freebuff Cloud wins#

  • Price. $0 vs $720/yr. That is not a rounding error; it is the whole point.
  • No compute metering. You will never hit a "you are out of fast requests" wall mid-task.
  • A real shareable preview. The live preview URL is meant to be sent to people who do not have Cursor installed — clients, teammates, recruiters.
  • Any repo. A three-year-old monorepo, a fork, a private company repo. Cloud is not limited to projects Cursor manages.

Stop paying $60/mo for the cloud part

Connect a repo to Freebuff Cloud and get a sandbox + live preview for $0.

Try Freebuff Cloud free
Can Freebuff Cloud replace Cursor Cloud entirely?+
If you mainly used Cursor Cloud for the remote sandbox and shareable preview, yes. If you depend on Cursor’s in-editor agent UX, you will probably want to keep Cursor for editing and use Freebuff for the cloud-sandbox layer.
Do I have to move my repo?+
No. Connect the same GitHub repo to Freebuff Cloud. Nothing moves; Freebuff clones it into a fresh sandbox.
Is the agent actually free per task?+
Yes. No credits, no ACUs, no fast/slow request buckets. The agent runs in the sandbox for free.

About the author

FT

The Freebuff Team· Building the free coding agent

We build Freebuff — the free CLI coding agent — and Freebuff Web, the free way to ship full-stack apps. No subscription, no setup, no lock-in.

Topics:free cursor cloud alternativecursor cloud freecursor background agent freecursor cloud pricingcursor cloud vs freebufffree alternative to cursorfree cloud sandbox cursorcursor compute freefree background coding agentfree cloud coding agent

Keep reading

We just killed paid coding agents

freebuff

© 2026 Freebuff. All rights reserved.